The Ohio Supreme Court is ordering the state鈥檚 top elections official to put a Summit County GOP leader back on the local board of elections.
, the court held that Secretary of State Frank LaRose 鈥渁bused his discretion鈥� in blocking county GOP chairman Bryan Williams from serving another term on the Summit County Board of Elections.
In March, LaRose intervened to stop Williams鈥� reappointment, alleging a host of problems at the Summit County board in recent years, including failures in clearing dead voters from the rolls and traffic snarls at the BOE during voting in 2020.
The county party executive committee contested LaRose鈥檚 decision, arguing that Williams 鈥� a former BOE director 鈥� was well qualified to serve as a member of the board. In an affidavit, Williams alleged the secretary鈥檚 move was born out of political bad blood between the two Republicans.
The court did not address Williams鈥� allegations of political retribution. But the justices did hold that LaRose failed to show Williams himself was responsible for any problems at the BOE. The court also ruled LaRose also did not substantiate allegations of a hostile work environment.
All seven justices endorsed the opinion, with one, Michael Donnelly, concurring separately.
鈥淭hough disappointed, we respect the Court鈥檚 decision,鈥� Rob Nichols, LaRose鈥檚 press secretary, wrote in an email. 鈥淎s Ohio鈥檚 chief elections officer, Secretary LaRose will continue to fight for integrity and accountability at Ohio鈥檚 88 county boards of elections, as evidenced by recent changes made at other county boards of elections and upheld by the Court. The Summit County Board of Elections remains under Administrative Oversight until they deliver the level of competence the citizens of that county deserve.鈥�
LaRose鈥檚 office alleged a 鈥減olitically charged environment鈥� at the board after receiving an anonymous letter claiming employees there endured a hostile culture.
The board鈥檚 director, Lance Reed, denied those allegations, according to the court鈥檚 opinion. And although the secretary鈥檚 office received two additional complaints after the legal case began, the court held that LaRose couldn鈥檛 use those retroactively to support his decision.
鈥淟aRose鈥檚 concerns about a dysfunctional board culture remain the product of rumors and suspicions,鈥� the court ruled.
LaRose had also faulted the board over traffic congestion at its Akron headquarters last year, as many early voters tried to drive ballots to the board鈥檚 drop box. But the court called those traffic problems 鈥減artly a problem of LaRose鈥檚 own creation,鈥� citing his decision to limit boards鈥� abilities to set up multiple ballot drop-off sites.
The justices also pointed to the traffic configuration on Grant Street as generally problematic.
鈥淟aRose fails to connect the traffic-flow problems during early voting to any action or inaction by Williams,鈥� the court wrote. 鈥淟aRose made the decision to prohibit ballot drop boxes at any location other than the board of election office itself. Williams had no control over the high volume of early voting or the bottleneck traffic pattern on Grant Street.鈥�
The secretary鈥檚 office had accused the board of failing to remove dead voters from the rolls. LaRose had also alleged that the BOE may have improperly canceled the registrations of voters convicted of felonies.
But the court ruled those issues were not a sufficient basis for blocking Williams鈥� reappointment. The court also wrote LaRose鈥檚 office itself may have contributed to confusion over how to determine which voters were serving time for felonies.
Read the opinion here:
Copyright 2021 90.3 WCPN ideastream. To see more, visit .
