海角破解版

A proposed wind energy project off the coast of Lake Erie is facing a lawsuit from two birding organizations. The groups allege not enough research has been done to determine the project鈥檚 environmental impact.

The suit, filed by Black Swamp Bird Observatory (BSBO) in Ohio and the American Bird Conservancy (ABC) based in Washington, D.C., against the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Army Corps of Engineers, argues the DOE 鈥渟hirked its obligations under the National Environmental Policy Act,鈥� along with the Clean Water Act and other environmental regulations.

The proposed wind farm, called the Icebreaker Project, would place six wind turbines on Lake Erie. It鈥檚 classified as demonstrative and could lead to further turbine construction. The birding agencies argue that the turbines would pose a threat to bird populations that live in and migrate through the area year-round, and the DOE did not undergo enough research to determine that impact.

鈥淲e feel like it鈥檚 just about to cross the finish line, and this project really needs to do its homework to get it right,鈥� said Joel Merriman, the Bird-Smart Wind Energy campaign director for ABC.

The DOE issued an Environmental Assessment for the project rather than an Environmental Impact Study, which is a more rigorous process. As a result, Merriman said, the research was limited in scope.

 鈥淚f you鈥檙e just doing surveys in the daytime in good weather, that鈥檚 really all you鈥檙e learning about, is in the daytime and good weather,鈥� Merriman said.

The suit argues Lake Erie is globally recognized as an important habitat for maintaining bird populations, and the research does not take that into account. The research also doesn鈥檛 account for any growth that could happen after the initial six turbines, Merriman said.

鈥淪ix turbines will have a certain amount of impact, but then if you鈥檝e got hundreds or more than a thousand turbines, that鈥檚 going to make a much, much bigger difference,鈥� Merriman said.

Merriman said his organization supports wind energy and turbine use, but not every project. Research is required to determine the right place, size and number of turbines, he said.

The lawsuit also calls for a more comprehensive analysis of alternatives to the Icebreaker Project, including consideration of other locations for the turbines, requiring bladeless turbines or developing post-construction monitoring and management.

No alternatives were considered, Merriman said.

鈥淭he two alternatives that were considered were the project and no action, which, needless to say, is not an alternatives analysis,鈥� he said.

The Lake Erie Energy Development Corporation, or LEEDCo, would build and install the turbines. LEEDCo emailed a statement to ideastream saying surveys of the area 鈥渃onsistently demonstrated very low bird activity鈥� in the area of the proposed turbines. A recommendation for an Environmental Impact Study was then dropped.

鈥淲e believe the U.S. Department of Energy and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have fully and faithfully carried out their obligations under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act to evaluate the impact of the project on all aspects of the environment,鈥� the statement said.

LEEDCo argues the impact statement is not warranted and would only add expenses and delays to the proposed wind farm.

A spokesperson for the U.S. Department of Energy says the DOE does not comment on pending litigation. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers did not respond to requests for comment.