Environmental activists and residents in Akron are calling for city council to redo the vote that cleared the way for White Pond Reserve, a controversial housing and retail development that will be built near an area of wetlands.
In December, Akron City Council approved the development by a vote of 7 to 6. After the meeting, concerned residents called attention to a 1990 city ordinance that states land sales need a supermajority to be approved, meaning at least nine councilmembers, unless the property was advertised for three weeks in a newspaper 鈥� which it wasn鈥檛.
The city sought a second opinion from private attorneys, which affirmed that only a simple majority was needed due to a 2020 change.
Other lawyers disagree, said Michele Colopy, executive director of environmental group LEAD for Pollinators. They hired a legal team, which filed a complaint Jan. 23. The city has until Feb. 21 to respond, Colopy said.
鈥淲e鈥檝e had too many differing opinions,鈥� she said. 鈥淚t鈥檚 a contradiction, and council actually should have fixed that a long time ago.鈥�
In the meantime, she鈥檚 urging residents to contact their councilmembers and write letters to the editor in local media outlets.
鈥淲e will certainly be working to change hearts and minds,鈥� Colopy said. 鈥淚n the end, we need to have council redo the vote. Just because a few people on council say 鈥榓h, the vote is good鈥� 鈥� on paper, it is not.鈥�
If the city does not immediately decide to take a new vote, LEAD will bring their legal challenge to court, where they鈥檒l advocate for a redo, Colopy added.
The development, which will include hundreds of residential units as well as some retail spaces, will be built upon 65 acres in a wooded area on the city鈥檚 west side.
Residents have a myriad of concerns about the White Pond development. They packed city council meetings calling attention to wildlife habitats that would be disrupted due to the tree clearing, as well as concerns that it would increase traffic in an already busy area. Additionally, many people who live near the green space said they enjoy walking their dogs and birdwatching on the land and had hoped it could be preserved.
City officials, however, said the development was needed to help meet the need for housing in the city. Final plans from the developer showed there would be no construction on the wetlands themselves.
About 45 people attended a meeting at the Northwest Akron library branch Wednesday night, where Colopy and other advocates updated residents on the legal challenge. They also provided education on wetlands, and why they are so important to the environment.
The goal, Colopy said, is to better prepare Akronites to fight against any future developments proposed on wetlands.
鈥淚t is not a place to build. It just is not. They鈥檙e going to doom that whole project by building it on wetlands,鈥� she said.
Developments on wetlands bring flooding and environmental concerns to surrounding neighborhoods, Colopy added.
