Twenty-five years after the Columbine school shooting in Colorado, gun violence continues to be a significant problem for schools. Now, some schools are turning to new technology as part of the effort to keep kids safe: AI.
At Berkshire Local Schools in Burton, elementary school kids are in the middle of their lunch as Superintendent John Stoddard points out the many security cameras watching everyone inside and outside the building.
鈥淚t鈥檚 an artificial intelligence that works inside the current surveillance cameras, and it is trained to identify a gun,鈥� he told 海角破解版. 鈥淚t only needs 1/3 of the gun to be visible in order for it to be seen.鈥�
Berkshire Schools has been using an AI system run by ZeroEyes for about two years. Stoddard said his was the first school to use ZeroEyes in Ohio, but he knows of about a dozen others that have adopted it now.
ZeroEyes was founded by a group of ex-Navy Seals in 2018 and is used in hundreds of buildings nationwide, most of them schools. Chief Revenue Officer and co-founder Sam Alaimo said the AI technology is invisible to students but incredibly fast.
鈥淭he whole point is within 3-5 seconds of the gun being seen in front of that camera you should get an alert,鈥� he said. 鈥淪o that鈥檚 not some teacher picking up the phone and saying, 鈥業 think something is happening here.鈥� Within 3-5 seconds law enforcement literally gets a picture, time stamp, location and weapons system of the shooter.鈥�
When the AI flags a gun, a human will review the video to verify it at one of their monitoring centers. If it鈥檚 deemed a legitimate threat, they will notify local law enforcement and school personnel. If it鈥檚 not, the school鈥檚 superintendent may get a text that a fake gun was detected, like Stoddard once did.
鈥淲e detect guns every single week,鈥� Alaimo said. 鈥淎 lot of real ones, a lot of fake ones.鈥�
A simulation from ZeroEyes shows the AI detecting a weapon
ZeroEyes is just one of many companies in the ever-growing field of AI-based school security. Other companies say they can detect a variety of weapons, not just guns, or operate not in security cameras but rather metal detectors.
Some AI companies have courted controversy, like Evolv Technologies, which claims to be able to identify not only guns but also knives and explosives. The company is now being sued after a student successfully carried a knife into a school using Evolv鈥檚 software and went on to stab multiple students.
Unfortunately, aside from market data completed by those companies, there is no independent data available on how effective AI is at preventing gun deaths on school grounds. Alaimo argues there鈥檚 also no way to know how many lives may have already been saved by this type of software.
But critics say the technology is unproven. Odis Johnson, the executive director of the Center for Safe and Healthy Schools at Johns Hopkins University, pointed out that despite efforts to improve school security features, the problem of violence in schools persists.
鈥淓very year in the last nine years we鈥檝e had year over year increases in injury and death related to shootings in schools,鈥� he said. 鈥淲e keep adding to the number at a greater clip than the year before, so this is still happening even as we implement more technology. So that is probably the greatest proof I can offer that this isn鈥檛 working.鈥�
Johnson thinks schools shouldn鈥檛 depend on AI to prevent a school shooting and may want to consider how the funds that pay for AI could be better spent, say on quality teachers or school counselors. He also suggested that the problem isn鈥檛 one that schools can solve alone.
鈥淣othing is going to keep kids safe within a context of gun proliferation and unchecked firearm regulation,鈥� he said.
At Berkshire Schools, Superintendent John Stoddard said he feels confident the AI system is working. School officials, local law enforcement and the company regularly run simulations to test the software.
鈥淶eroEyes is not our safety plan alone, ZeroEyes is a layer to our safety plan,鈥� Stoddard said.
The district paid for the software with a grant from the state and has it installed in about a third of its total security cameras. According to ZeroEyes, their software costs between $20 and $50 per camera stream per month.
Stoddard said the school also has many proactive measures in place, from social workers to partnerships with local mental health providers to anonymous tip lines where students and staff can report potential threats.
鈥淲e feel like if students have a sense of belonging, they have activities and they have things they鈥檙e interested in and they鈥檙e participating in things in the school and they make positive connections to the school, then they鈥檙e less likely to want to act out in inappropriate ways or commit acts of violence,鈥� he said.
But just in case, the AI is always watching.
