![The City of Mentor currently needs to seek voter approval for any changes to the marina or lagoon. [The City of Mentor]](https://npr.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/afcdadb/2147483647/strip/true/crop/980x551+0+0/resize/840x472!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnpr-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2Flegacy%2Fuploads%2F2020%2F10%2F30%2FMentor-Lagoons-Marina-1.jpg)
Two ballot initiatives are asking Mentor residents to allow changes to the local marina and lagoons and to loosen restrictions for future changes.
City officials currently need to seek approval from voters to make significant changes to the city-owned marina and lagoons, including the proposed construction of an Americans with Disabilities Act-compliant boardwalk an observation deck.
The city received a matching grant of $115,050 for the boardwalk, the first step in a series of development plans. But without voter approval for the additions, Mentor City Councilmember Janet Dowling said, the city would lose that funding.
鈥淚t鈥檚 very difficult, and the marina is a business,鈥� Dowling said. 鈥淲hether it鈥檚 municipal or not, it鈥檚 still a business competing with private marinas all along eastern parts of Lake Erie.鈥�
One issue on the ballot would allow the city to install the boardwalk and begin work on the observation deck and tower. An additional proposal would lighten the restrictions on what the city can do without voter approval, Dowling said. The change necessary to stay competitive with other marinas, she said.
鈥淭here鈥檚 a huge resurgence on the lakefront in marinas, and a lot of neighboring marinas are putting in a lot of amenities,鈥� Dowling said.
The city of Mentor also would be able to create more revenue sources through the marina, she said, if every move no longer required voter approval.
鈥淲e don鈥檛 have a bait store or a boat repair or any food services or a gas stock,鈥� Dowling said. 鈥淲e just have the two basic [funding sources], dock and storage.鈥�
A similar measure was voted down in 2019. The language was confusing for voters, Dowling said, and caused concerns about the potential sale or leasing of the property. The city attempted to simplify the language this election cycle, she said, and to make it clear that property could not be leased or sold without voter approval. Residential developments also would need to go to a vote, she said.
鈥淚t鈥檚 a little difficult to run a business with a committee of 17,000 or 18,000 voters having to approve changes,鈥� Dowling said. 鈥淵ou鈥檙e not going to see any major improvements or any keeping up with the times and the trends with voting.鈥�
